Ayo Labinjoh, the woman who claims that her teenage daughter, Anu Adeleke, was fathered by Nigerian music star Davido, has reignited the long-running paternity dispute, accusing the singer of abandoning his responsibilities and misleading the public about DNA test results.
In a series of emotional statements shared online, Labinjoh criticised Davido for denying her daughter’s paternity and described his actions as irresponsible. She also dismissed claims that she is pursuing the singer because of his wealth or fame, insisting that their relationship began before he became a global superstar.
The renewed controversy has once again sparked debate across social media, with fans and critics weighing in on one of the most contentious personal disputes involving the award-winning Afrobeats star.
“You Are a Boy, Not a Man” — Labinjoh’s Strong Words
In her statement, Labinjoh accused Davido of failing to take responsibility for a child she insists is his.
“You are a boy, not a man. You are a dad, not a father,” she wrote.
She argued that Davido has consistently avoided addressing the issue directly and instead relied on public relations strategies to shape public opinion in his favour.
According to her, the singer knows the truth about their past relationship and should be willing to submit to an independent DNA test rather than making public denials.
Claims About Their Relationship
Labinjoh maintained that her relationship with Davido began in February 2013, when he was still an up-and-coming artiste.
She said they met at a concert after-party in Ibadan following Davido’s performance at the “Dami Duro” concert.
“At the time, he was not super rich. I only knew him as a fast-rising singer and the son of a businessman,” she said.
She rejected claims that she is motivated by money or fame, stating that her only interest is securing her daughter’s identity and recognition.
Allegations of Financial Support
Labinjoh further alleged that Davido sent her money on the day of her daughter’s naming ceremony in November 2013, which she believes supports her claim that he knew about the child.
She also claimed that a video call was placed from a phone number allegedly associated with Davido in November 2025, which she said coincided with his #5Alive concert in Ibadan.
She questioned why the singer would attempt to contact her years later if he truly believed the child was not his.
Dispute Over DNA Test Claims
One of the central points of the controversy is Davido’s claim that multiple DNA tests have proven that Anu is not his biological daughter.
Labinjoh rejected this assertion, saying there were no independent DNA tests conducted for her daughter.
She alleged that the singer has counted DNA tests involving his other children as proof that Anu is not his.
According to her, the five DNA tests he has referenced relate to his children with other women.
She listed the following as the DNA tests she claims Davido has referred to:
- Anu Adeleke – September 2014
- Imade Adeleke – June 2015
- Hailey Adeleke – May 2017
- Dawson Adeleke – June 2021
- Ivanna Bayy – June 2023 (in utero)
Labinjoh insists that none of these tests conclusively addressed her daughter’s case in a transparent and independent manner.
Response to Critics and Public Figures
Labinjoh also directed criticism at media personality Daddy Freeze, accusing him of defending Davido during a live broadcast without encouraging an independent DNA test.
She said public figures should not take sides in such sensitive matters without full knowledge of the facts.
She also referenced media entrepreneur Dele Momodu, who she said has chosen not to intervene in the matter despite his closeness to the Adeleke family.
According to Labinjoh, public silence from influential figures has contributed to what she described as unfair treatment of her daughter.
A History of Public Disputes
The paternity dispute between Labinjoh and Davido is not new. It dates back to 2014, when she first publicly claimed that the singer was the father of her child.
At the time, Davido denied the claim, saying DNA tests showed he was not the biological father.
The disagreement has resurfaced repeatedly over the years, often trending on social media whenever new statements emerge from either side.
The issue has remained unresolved in the public eye, with neither party presenting court-certified DNA documentation.
Impact on Public Perception
The controversy has divided public opinion.
Supporters of Labinjoh argue that Davido should submit to an independent, court-supervised DNA test to put the matter to rest.
Others believe the singer has already addressed the issue and should be left alone.
Some fans have criticised Labinjoh for making the dispute public, while others say she has a right to speak out if she believes her child has been wronged.
Silence From Davido’s Camp
As of the time of writing, Davido has not issued a fresh public statement in response to Labinjoh’s latest allegations.
His management team has also remained silent on the renewed claims.
In the past, the singer has maintained that DNA tests confirmed Anu is not his biological daughter.
A Personal Dispute in the Public Eye
The case highlights the growing trend of deeply personal disputes playing out on social media, where public opinion often becomes part of the conflict.
For Labinjoh, the issue is about recognition and identity for her daughter.
For Davido, it remains a matter he has consistently denied.
Until an independent legal process resolves the dispute, the controversy is likely to continue generating debate among fans and observers.
A Story That Refuses to Go Away
More than a decade after the alleged relationship, the disagreement continues to resurface, reminding the public that fame does not shield celebrities from personal controversies.
For now, the truth remains disputed, and the final outcome uncertain.
What is clear is that the story has become one of the most talked-about celebrity paternity disputes in Nigerian entertainment history.
This report is based on statements made by Ayo Labinjoh. Davido has previously denied the claims. This publication presents the information as reported and does not assert any position on the matter.